anytype-kotlin
anytype-kotlin copied to clipboard
Any plans for F-Droid repo?
Have you read a contributing guide?
- [X] I have read CONTRIBUTING.md
- [X] I have searched the existing requests and didn't find any that were similar
- [X] I have considered creating a pull request instead and want to proceed
Clear and concise description of the problem
Some of your targeted users (me for example) might run non Google based phones. This can easily be archived by installing a custom rom without installing additional Google support. Those phones will lack a Play Store. The app currently seems only be available from Google Play Store.
Suggested solution
Submit the app to F-Droid store.
Alternative
No response
Additional context
No response
I agree, anyway in the meantime I'm installing Anytype and tracking updates with Obtainium
I would like this on F-Droid as well
Maybe @IzzySoft could help with a stop-gap measure (the IzzyOnDroid repo)
https://gitlab.com/IzzyOnDroid/repo/-/wikis/Inclusion%20Policy
Details
Running on private resources (no funding), IzzyOnDroid usually reserves up to 30 megabytes per app (exceptions are being made for some larger apps, so this is considered as rule-of-thumb). That's at the same time the upper size limit for single .apk files. If multiple files can fit in this limit, the repo holds up to 3 versions.
Details
To determine which licenses are FLOSS, We defer to widely trusted organizations that have a proven track record. Specifically, we acknowledge these standards: DFSG, FSF, GNU, and OSI (read a quick overview of them all on SPDX).
Source: https://f-droid.org/en/docs/Inclusion_Policy/
I searched the mentioned sources for Any Source Available License 1.0 but no results. So CMIIW @linsui technically it's not FOSS (at least to F-Droid standard) hence can't be included to F-Droid ?
but only (a) for Non-Commercial Use, or (b) for Commercial Use in Allowed Networks.
This is obviously not FOSS.
I searched the mentioned sources for Any Source Available License 1.0 but no results.
Not even mentioned at SPDX – so no, this cannot be considered libre I'm afraid.