Highlight *S*upported items

[gundalow]

Some items on the list are Supported by Red Hat, should we highlight that?

Other projects are Maintained by Red Hat, should they be highlighted?

I've not looked at enough other lists to see what they do.

[gundalow]

@KeyboardInterrupt what do you think? I don't want to abuse what you've built over the years.

Maybe something like:

Ansible Lint - Checks Playbooks for best practices and behavior that could potentially be improved. (Supported by Red Hat) ARA - ARA Records Ansible playbooks and makes them easier to understand and troubleshoot with a reporting API, UI and CLI. (Maintained by Ansible Community)

[KeyboardInterrupt]

I think distinguishing, or rather highlighting, Items, in a way is a good Idea. I have seen other lists do similar things by utilizing Emojis i.E. adding a 🐋 when something runs on docker or 💎 when something is "especially awesome".

But I guess adding Text is more clean, inclusive and easily implemented.

A compromise would be to have labels like this:

• 
• 
• 

With good Alt text for the Images, this approach would also be pretty and somewhat inclusive for People with screenreaders.

[rndmh3ro]

I prefer plain text (maybe bold or italics) instead of emojis or labels. Plain text does not interrupt the text flow and is more accessible.

[KeyboardInterrupt]

Hey, I want to revisit this. After some more pondering, I believe we shouldn't introduce a special label; instead, we could leverage the description text, like so:

• Ansible Essentials - Course - Free Video Classroom on Ansible essentials by Red Hat.

This item is already distinctly identified as a resource provided by Red Hat through its description.

I think explicitly stating the source in the description might suffice without the need for bold, italic, or any other formatting.

If there's no strong objection to this approach, I'd like to close this issue.