Andy Massimino

Based on this example, I think the current behavior is close to the best that we can do, so I'll close this issue for now. The neovim/tree-sitter version is slightly...

Thank you!

Closing this old issue out as some things have changed meanwhile. 1. This fix from a previous comment was incorporated into the main html patterns. 2. Using `after/ftplugin/javascript.vim` is totally...

Because it uses the Treesitter AST, my expectation is matchup#ts_syntax#skip_expr would be very fast. (At least faster than vim syntax highlighting.) Maybe there is something wrong in the way it's...

Still seems a bug. The promise of treesitter is that things are blazing fast. I will investigate nevertheless. On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 11:10 AM zeertzjq ***@***.***> wrote: > I...

I see a huge amount of lag in regexp_nfa.c when scrolling but it doesn't seem to be caused by ts syntax skip but instead this call to get_active_nodes https://github.com/andymass/vim-matchup/blob/3c4ccc489002fe72b5d2e2ffc4b3b5a7d3ab65d8/lua/treesitter-matchup/internal.lua#L221 When...

You should be able to get something simple working via au FileType nunjucks let b:match_words = matchup#util#standard_html() au BufNewFile,BufRead *.njk setf nunjucks In your config, although I didn't test it.

Are you looking for vim or neovim On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, 2:01 PM Léonard Gomez ***@***.***> wrote: > I always found it jarring that vims '%' operator wouldn't match...

Thanks, this looking great. Will take me a bit to review. Have a couple questions to start 1. Can you link to any nvim-treesitter discussions that document what's changing? 2....

> declaring that vim-matchup requires treesitter highlighting This seems reasonable, as match-up already has deferred mode (which could be migrated to lua on_bytes but one thing at a time). What's...