Andrew DalPino

That's a cool setup, definitely share your findings and do join us in our Telegram channel if you'd like https://t.me/RubixML

We could allow a new "list" datatype in the Dataset object to accommodate multi-label problems. We could also implement a new "MultiOutput" layer.

> @andrewdalpino Hello, is this still and bug or it was fixed? Hey @Jeckerson, I can't remember hahah but it hasn't effected our development lately. I will say we no...

Thanks for sharing @MarkLuds!

Thank you very much @P2T we'll try to figure this out

Thank you @cmb69! We appreciate the help - let us know what we can do on our end!

Oh sorry about that, I'll have to find a way to allow comments on merged PRs. Thanks for the explanation, it really helps alot! We still need to figure a...

Hey @Snicser, you can use Online Learners to train a model with new data after it has already been trained. https://docs.rubixml.com/2.0/online.html

Hi @sr13579 yes it's possible but it's not optimal. You can design a dataset such that the next value in the sequence is the label of the sample. If you...

Hey @Anecho thanks for the question. Yeah I had to put Rubix DL down to rest because I was the only developer and I had to choose between developing open-source...