Christopher Barber

Indeed that doing it that way would be more general, although if you try it you will see that it is much less obvious how you would do it, it...

I am pretty sure this implementation is not really correct at least in where the substitutions are done. But it would be nice to get feedback on the relative cross...

I have updated the merge request but have subclassed the python handler for use in my own projects. I don't have any need for the more general solution and since...

It would be nice to have a syntax that works for other languages, but this implementation is obviously python-specific and in practice any given use of the cross-reference syntax will...

FYI, I just published a public package that implements this proposal. This is an alternate handler that subclasses the standard python handler and adds this capability: https://analog-garage.github.io/mkdocstrings-python-xref/

I actually find that syntax even more confusing. You can always fork my project and implement your own syntax if you want.

That is pretty much what my implementation does. You don't have to use the '^', '(c)' and '(m)' notation if you don't want to. However, in actual practice, we found...

> Released as v1.9.0 of the insiders version 🙂 (v1.11.1.1.9.0) > > @analog-cbarber would you like to send a PR to list your project as an alternative in the `#relative_crossrefs`...

Could you catch and ignore this as a temporary fix?

I got this working using Xcode 8.2.1, which is based on clang 3.9. I had to modify the scripts to use `clang`/` clang++` without the version suffix. I did run...