Andreas Motl

Thank you for reporting this. So, do you think we should adjust both "reference" and "dbal" projects to behave like the others?

Hi again. Has this been fixed by this other patch? - https://github.com/crate/infrastructure/pull/3152 Do you think we can close the issue, or are there some leftovers to consider?

## Progress ### With header and footer Now also uses CSS directive `position: sticky` instead of `position: fixed`. -- 9fb507e58a532, e135bd44ad1  ### With content Content, page tools, and version...

Hi again. @msbt contributed significantly to this patch. Thank you very much! - GH-506 We will integrate those improvements here, and run a devX release, in order to be able...

Originally submitted on Jul 22, 2023, more than a year ago, this was quite a long-running patch once again, traveling through marvellous journeys in exciting times. Thank you so much...

https://github.com/crate/cloud-docs/pull/55#discussion_r1511464819 also shows we need to add some example about linking to `doc` targets instead of `ref` labels, i.e. does that work already like this, or differently? ```markdown [](inv:croud#commands/clusters) ```

See also: - https://github.com/executablebooks/MyST-Parser/issues/548 - https://github.com/executablebooks/myst-enhancement-proposals/issues/9

`docutils==0.18` has been released on 2021-10-26, see [Release 0.18 (2021-10-26)](https://docutils.sourceforge.io/RELEASE-NOTES.html#release-0-18-2021-10-26).

`docutils==0.19` has been released on 2022-07-05, see [Release 0.19 (2022-07-05)](https://docutils.sourceforge.io/RELEASE-NOTES.html#release-0-19-2022-07-05).

docutils [0.20](https://docutils.sourceforge.io/RELEASE-NOTES.html#toc-entry-8) and [0.20.1](https://docutils.sourceforge.io/HISTORY.html#toc-entry-2) have been released in May 2023.