Alvaro Viebrantz
Alvaro Viebrantz
Hopefully this is resolve by #6560
@sergioregueira, the behavior that you reported is indeed an issue in our library. Basically the `Query.wrapIntegers` was being ignored. For it to works you need to pass as a `QueryResultsOptions`....
As for the microsecond precision support, another PR was opened to fix that ( #1192 ). It basically that uses [@google-cloud/precise-date](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@google-cloud/precise-date) to parse timestamp arriving as a float64 to a...
This is blocked by internal issue 143553831, which tracks support for nanosecond precision.
Hey @pomplesiegel, thanks for the feedback. About this project, it users the TTN Webhook interface, so TTN posts data to this backend, and data is saved on Google, so there...
Sorry for the late response. Yes it is active, do you have any specific question ?
hey @hamza-busuri thanks for asking: 1. `Can we create authorized views within the source dataset id or do we need to create a shared one?` * The shared dataset is...
> Thanks @alvarowolfx ! > > I wanted to double check is it possible to apply the access policy on the created view or does the access policy need to...
This is similar to https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-go/issues/4950 and this old PR https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-go/pull/7315 tries to solve it. This introduces a breaking change and we ended up postponing it and it got stale. Thoughts...