Aleksandar Petrov

Could we use this to replace what was done in #2808?

Either approach sounds good to me. Putting them in an archive will reduce the chance of the problem surfacing again in the future which would be nice.

> Looks good overall, however, I think we need to make sure that only the current leader removes blocks from the object storage. I might be mistaken, but this is...

Closing this as the ebpf module was removed with #4324. Thank you for you contribution @def.

Hey @Gerrit-K, thanks for the report. Could you confirm what version of the profiler (pyroscope-java) you are using? I see a few related and fixed issues in the underlying profiling...

cc @korniltsev This looks good at a first glance. The tricky part is making sure the upgrade doesn't break anything. Unfortunately there are no integration tests for this right now,...

Closing this as we think the root problem is resolved here.

https://github.com/grafana/pyroscope/pull/3354 does this in the `profilecli` and can be used for reference.

@bryanhuhta should we close this one or is it still relevant?