Akshay Shah

Thank you for your continued support, @linsun! I think everyone's in agreement that TAG Network is the right home for Connect: - Speaking for the Connect maintainers, we'd prefer to...

Totally understand wanting health checking to be as simple as possible - shorter's better! Even without built-in GET support, I think you can shorten your k8s and Docker compose configurations...

For any readers unfamiliar with Connect's project structure, the conformance tests in question are https://github.com/connectrpc/conformance.

@dfawley Given grpc/grpc-go#6662, is it possible to reassess the priority of this issue? It'd be really nice for the community to have the expected behavior of `grpc-status-details-bin` clearly defined (and...

@dfawley Are you open to a PR to the specification with text similar to what you're describing? Just documenting that `grpc-status-details-bin` should contain a `Status` proto would be an improvement.

Sounds like a reasonable approach to me. Can you open a PR?

Sorry for the long delay. The best way to test this is to add an error with a `Format` method. I pushed a commit to your branch to add some...

This is included in v1.1.0, which I just tagged. Thanks again for the contribution, @komuw!

Agree that we're not in compliance with RFC 6838, and also agree that changing this is low-priority. Since neither protobuf nor Connect streaming have registered Content-Types, our options for becoming...

All good points :) It'd be great for the spec to match the conformance tests on all of these points.