hackerman

I think that’s a great idea! We had feature requests like this one before but noone actually ever implemented them. The most difficult thing will probably be naming conventions and...

It would be quite difficult to achieve that with the feature set right now because claims should only be set by the Authorization Server (or one of it's sources, e.g....

@svrakitin have you seen https://github.com/ory/hydra/issues/1748 ? I think it makes a tad more sense as it kinda decouples the two components. We might still be able to add some function...

Hm I think it would be better to have a dedicated endpoint where admin access allows to specify client claims. You can then update the client when changes are needed,...

Yes, good idea. It's a bit tricky to document this in Swagger but should nontheless be documented. You can however find a list of all error codes [here](https://github.com/ory/fosite/blob/master/errors.go).

Nice! If you're down to add this stuff to swagger let me know and I can point you in the right direction!

I'm not sure if this is the best approach to take here. If you have access to the token, you have access to the subject (in the case of `client_credentials`...

Hydra supports token customization for all grants except client_credentials already. Are you looking specifically for customization of tokens issued by the client_credentials grant?

> yes and no.there is a way to customize tokens , yes, but customization is not configured on a authorization server side, therefore is "optional" and not enforced. Sorry, I...

Am I correct in assuming that this can be merged with #1383 ?