Adam Retter

@joewiz I think this should now be fixed. Can you test again, pulling in the latest source code?

It is an interesting idea and I can see your argument. However, query parameters are defined as Resource Function Parameters which means they are always optional. I quite like that,...

Christian, Do you allow both forms in the rest:path syntax?

Okay I have done a bit of reading into this. It appears that from a Client perspective it is important not to treat /a the same as /a/, there are...

Hmm. I am not sure that all web-servers do this redirect automagically. Do you have a link to one that does or an appropriate standard?

Hi Christian, It was always the intention to add WADL support but to make it optional. The problem with a function is it becomes much harder for it to be...

I had certainly intended to create a Schema for the result of rest:resource-function, but have not yet found the time. The output is currently as described in the email that...

Hi Jakub, As Christian pointed out the Request Module would be the mechanism for this, however it is not implemented in eXist yet because the spec is not stable. The...

I am not sure of the need for url rewriting or parameter aliasing, do you have a use-case that cannot be met by a Request Module and RESTXQ combined together?...

I had hoped to avoid something like %restxq:request, just as I have been dodging a @Context equivalent in RESTXQ. I had rather hoped we could solve the issue in a...