Adam Altman

This is good because it is one of the more popular ones. Others would be `x-logo`, `x-codeSamples`, and `x-enumDescriptions`.

I don't think this is a bug. This seems like a feature request? By default the objects allow additional properties. So by example it is technically correct (unless the additionalProperties...

`required-properties-described`

Hi David, yes, we believe you have a misunderstanding. Your request is a good feature request, but it is not bug. Let's look at this example: ```yaml type: object required:...

@davidkuridza finally in progress on this one. 👍

We can consider support for "Meta-data keywords" because: > Meta-data keywords are the most interoperable because they don’t affect validation. For example, you could add a units keyword. This will...

It could be linked to an older version. Does it still have this issue with the latest VS Code extension @lucianojs ?

It's not a property of Operation from what I see but a property that contains the Operation as its value. Operation has these properties like `tags`, `summary`: https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/blob/main/versions/3.1.0.md#fixed-fields-8 It's a...

Is there another name you would suggest? @RomanHotsiy any opinion?

I have a proposal. Remove key from the names: ## Context object (desired) Property | Type | Description -- | -- | -- type | `string` | **REQUIRED.** One of...