AU

LGTM

What would be the "extra step for the user"? czw., 2 cze 2022, 16:10 użytkownik thebluedirt ***@***.***> napisał: > Well, STEP import/export is not related to the internal representation of...

Should I merge @jmwright @lorenzncode ?

Thanks @qwelyt !

Closed by #1129

I can confirm that the gist was the way to go, though for me it required some modifications: https://github.com/CadQuery/OCP/blob/master/pystreambuf.h

+1, merging this PR would be highly appreciated. Regarding the remarks of @certik , sounds like you want to use `add_custom_command` (see [here](https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/command/add_custom_command.html#examples-generating-files)) instead of `execute_process` and generate the needed...

Thanks again @RashKash103 for the contribution

> @adam-urbanczyk @lorenzncode Any objections to merging this? We did not reach a conclusion on this topic, so -1 on merging as-is.

Are you looking for this: https://github.com/CadQuery/CQ-editor/releases/tag/nightly ? It is mentioned in the README: https://github.com/CadQuery/CQ-editor#development-packages , is the phrasing not clear or was it simply missed?