WAS
Allow safety checker pipeline configuration that returns boolean array but does not black out images
Wouldn't it be far more beneficial to return Gaussian blurred images, like in the Discord beta? If the image is black, you don't know if this is something to refine...
Allow safety checker pipeline configuration that returns boolean array but does not black out images
@patrickvonplaten > Note that especially for topics regarding the safety checker, there are many different ideas/opinions out there and we cannot try to find a solution that works for everyone....
Allow safety checker pipeline configuration that returns boolean array but does not black out images
> That said, though I disagree with the tone of WASasquatch, I think overall they make a good point -- there aren't many DEVELOPER use cases that play well with...
Allow safety checker pipeline configuration that returns boolean array but does not black out images
> * 1.) Allow an option to **not** black out an image, but return a boolean whether it's safe or not. As said above, personally I don't see the huge...
Allow safety checker pipeline configuration that returns boolean array but does not black out images
Alright, and I have a PR that I was working on. I just need to read up on PRs I guess. As I only really know how to do it...
Allow safety checker pipeline configuration that returns boolean array but does not black out images
> In light of the recent controversy between Stability and the creators of Stable Diffusion (see: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33283712 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33279290) I think it's important to strongly consider the incentives behind how...
Allow safety checker pipeline configuration that returns boolean array but does not black out images
Two thoughts None for the safety_checker yields warnings which must also be disabled. Something that is unintuitive for a static system someone must set a specific way themselves for that...
So there is no init image support or mask support in `DiffusionPipeline()`? I don't see it referenced. What is the point of these community pipelines, exactly?
> Hey @WASasquatch, > > Sorry I don't really understand your question here - what does `init_image` have to do with community pipelines? The point of community pipeline is explained...
Looking at all these pipelines. Things are quickly falling apart, imo. Pipelines doing one little thing, and then its own pipeline to manage, is horribly counter-productive. This is falling back...