The Phantom Derpstorm

The compiler errors say that we would need to figure out the Lua 5.1 equivalents of the following: ``` lua_tounsigned luaL_setfuncs luaL_requiref lua_rawlen ``` unsigned, we can replace with a...

Ultimately, however, my recommendation would be to wait for Mike Pall to update LuaJIT to work with 5.2 and upcoming 5.3.

@SkyMarshal @happen23 This took a while, but the pull requests referencing this issue has LuaJIT 5.1 support. Once it's evaluated by @Rapptz it should be good to go. Good luck.

Not a clue if there's an MSVC version of this. Will find out.

That's not a name though, is it?

Is there a particular reason for mangling warnings? I was under the impression we had a warningless build.

I am currently busy with a few other things so I can't check this right now. Intuition tells me that just hooking up a bunch of free functions where you...

I can safely say, @iganinja, that luajit is THE way to speed up any lua runtime. It comes with the cost of knowing how to compile it for your platforms,...

There was a bug in the logic for detecting whether or not a table was called with `.new` versus `:new`. This is fixed in `sol2`.

Try using ``` cpp sol::table t = ...; t.for_each( /* function that takes key, value */ ) ; ``` Note that this is only present in the `develop` branch of...