Mav
Mav
There's still the topic to discuss: I'm in favor of providing `onStart()` with an initial progress value to calculate the starting conditions from since `MoveEffect` can be affected by bounds...
@spydon ``` In the case that dProgress becomes negative it is supposed to go backwards. Say that the previous progress is 0.9 and it it supposed to move backwards to...
> @TheMaverickProgrammer I haven't had the time to test it properly yet unfortunately (forgot that it was on my table 😅), but there is a test failing, could you have...
> > There can be a MoveTo effect and a MoveToWithCorrection effect. > > Hmm, I'm not too fond of that idea, it feels like a less clean API. How...
> @TheMaverickProgrammer will you continue on this PR at some point, or what is the state of it? :) We needed a response from you to move forward. The problem...
> > It seems to be the case that the proposed solutions would be less than ideal. I provided context as to why these would be needed but I did...
> > I can implement whatever changes seem best but I would need your explicit instructions in order to quickly resolve the matter. > > So basically: > > *...
Closing PR to start two other, modular PRs. This PR will be closed but used as a reference in the next two.
Is this intended for the language or the meta-language? In other-words, are these concepts for the compiler optimizations or for end-users?
> @TheMaverickProgrammer This PR needs a little conflict resolving with main, but it should be quite trivial, it's mostly formatting. Ping us when this is ready for review, we're planning...