Emily Fox

I think we should stick to each phase of CNCF model, any changes in the projects status should prompt a review (pre-incubation, incubation to sandbox, sandbox to graduation, and once...

concur with @lumjjb

reading back through the ticket and discussion, want to double check before updating the ticket: 1. Create general README in (assessments/projects)[https://github.com/cncf/sig-security/tree/master/assessments/projects] 2. updated Assessment process to create a README in...

updated - over to you @JustinCappos

Planning on updating this ticket to rescope based on discussion: - [ ] Create general README in [assessments/projects](https://github.com/cncf/sig-security/tree/master/assessments/projects) - [ ] in [assessments/guide](https://github.com/cncf/sig-security/tree/master/assessments/guide) update Step 5, task 3 "Project lead...

> * assessments/guide the [joint-review README](https://github.com/cncf/tag-security/blob/main/assessments/guide/joint-readme-template.md) template needs updated to specify: * [ ] original issue for assessment, * [ ] assessment date, and * [ ] project status at...

@vinayvenkat tagging you here for awareness/interest we'll need to define an editorial team to curate content, field content. this applies to the microblog #451 issue as well - at least...

@ultrasaurus things in my head on this. Want to talk about something? 1. Review existing issues, if not there Create an issue, 2. add it to the planned meeting template,...

Before it becomes a project it needs a scope, a project lead, and a sponsor.

related to this particular file: https://github.com/cncf/tag-security/blob/main/governance/process.md