Benjamin Staneck
Benjamin Staneck
Well it could, when implementing it like this | Media | Directive | Shorthand | |-------|--------------|-----------| | Image | :image[](){} | ![](){} | | Video | :video[](){} | ^[](){} |...
I just picked a random example, really
I meant I picked a random suggestion from the topic I linked. > I guess if you look at the ![] syntax as more of a media syntax than an...
I'd say mp4 and webm as containers
Oh wow, yeah, that is really great. Could you post the generated HTML as well?
Ah yeah I think that would work, as comparision, this is the "standard" of how I do my videos: ```html ```
I think I like the marking as fallback idea more because it's a little clearer to read. Would something like this work as well? ``` {fallback='video.mp4'} ```
I will test it, I'm not sure when I'll have time but I hope next week!
Sort of disagree with this being a dupe, the implementation would be quite different, native video tag vs iframe
The thing is, youtube embeds only work with iframes, so yes, in theory it could work with every other video service that requires this but we'd then have to have...