SkyzohKey
SkyzohKey
@sirius-c +1 for the comment as a whole. -1 for « keep version histories [...] can [...] be left to the clients. ». I hope you understand why.
Because integrity. Not every client will maintain revision history if that's not included in ToxCore and having all the clients being able to support a key feature like that should...
@GrayHatter http://beta.tox.chat/blog/post/3/tox-chat-logs-standard
The last time I checked new group chats it was an issue with TCP. Dunno if any significant progress has been made but it would be nice to have current...
> And we shall wait forevermore. :+1: > @ProMcTagonist said: > Why bother with that? cuz > We are still waiting for the new groupchats to be merged into toxcore
@ProMcTagonist Ricin doesn't supports groupchats cuz we're waiting for the new groupchats. Honnestly supporting current group chat until the new ones gets merged in the master _(count at least 1...
@ProMcTagonist Yep but why not merging the PR with TCP groups unavailable for now ? It would permit for clients to implement new groupchats working in UDP, falling back to...
Or not supporting Old groupchats at all. But at least merging the new one. Even if their is not yet TCP support when the TCP issue will be close toxcore'll...
@2Belette yes. New group chats are vaporware and won't happens anytime soon. Do either wait for 5-6 years more (already 3 years since I said that they weren't going to...