Danny Mösch
Danny Mösch
Both `-emit-sil` and `-emit-ir` for Swift have been working for a while now. This request can be considered done I guess.
> Hi Do we have to add a new case for 'ib_segue_action'. If so then I am not able to figure out what else is needed to change. I have...
> Hi @SimplyDanny I was trying to figure out when should I return .ibSegueAction in [typeContent](https://github.com/realm/SwiftLint/blob/main/Source/SwiftLintBuiltInRules/Rules/Style/TypeContentsOrderRule.swift#L78) method. Will this a part of [functionMethodInstance](https://github.com/realm/SwiftLint/blob/main/Source/SwiftLintBuiltInRules/Rules/Style/TypeContentsOrderRule.swift#L109). Or should i return at the place...
> If you got some time from you busy schedule can you please tell me what needs to be taken care of to pass all the tests. Or does it...
Hey @woxtu! Thank you for the rewrite. I'd be glad to review your PR. Could you please rebase it onto the current `main` and adapt the code to the changes...
The remaining OSS findings are either valid or are caused by a parsing error (`sending` keyword). The latter will be fixed with the next SwiftSyntax update.
SwiftLint now supports every version from 1.2.1.
General review and CI are good now. 👍 However, there are still a few unresolved review comments.
There has been some ongoing work in #3421 for support of a "baseline" functionality. Seems like a better and more flexible solution for your request than various configured thresholds. Unfortunately,...
This is the expected behavior. If SwiftLint found errors, it also exits with an error code other than 0 (2 actually). According to that, it doesn't break the pipeline, but...