Feature: Added Self Feedback

[AbTrax]

Background

The rationale behind adding the self-feedback feature in the Agent class is to enhance the AI's ability to verify and validate its own thoughts, reasoning, plans, and criticism. This will help improve the AI's decision-making process and allow it to autonomously generate better responses over time. The self-feedback feature is aligned with the project's overall direction of creating an efficient and intelligent AI agent.

Changes

The specific changes made in this pull request involve adding a new method called get_self_feedback() to the Agent class. This method takes in a dictionary of thoughts containing keys such as 'reasoning', 'plan', 'thoughts', and 'criticism'. It combines these elements into a single feedback message and uses the create_chat_completion() function to generate a response based on the input message. This allows the AI to verify and validate its own thoughts before executing a command.

Documentation

The changes are documented through in-code comments and this explanation. The get_self_feedback() method has a docstring that explains its purpose, input, and output. Additionally, the rationale and changes sections above provide further context and explanation.

Test Plan

Testing the self-feedback functionality can be challenging due to the open-ended nature of the responses.

PR Quality Checklist

• [x] My pull request is atomic and focuses on a single charge.
• [x] I have thoroughly tested my changes with multiple different prompts.
• [x] I have considered potential risks and mitigations for my changes.
• [x] I have documented my changes clearly and comprehensively.
• [x] I have not snuck in any "extra" small tweaks changes

Due to the open-ended nature of the Self-feedback getting continuous exact answers and negative answers is quite hard whilst getting good open answers is not always the same and can vary differ.

[AbTrax]

@merwanehamadi Here is the Adverse/Feedback

[AbTrax]

If it's merged I can add it to the usage.md

[github-actions[bot]]

This pull request has conflicts with the base branch, please resolve those so we can evaluate the pull request.

[ntindle]

If it's merged I can add it to the usage.md

Can you add it in the PR so the docs get updated instantly?

[AbTrax]

If it's merged I can add it to the usage.md

Can you add it in the PR so the docs get updated instantly?

You are right I'll do it now

[github-actions[bot]]

Conflicts have been resolved! 🎉 A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 16.66% and project coverage change: -8.38 :warning:

Comparison is base (29284a5) 49.52% compared to head (139ae35) 41.14%.

:exclamation: Current head 139ae35 differs from pull request most recent head 82db4e9. Consider uploading reports for the commit 82db4e9 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3013      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   49.52%   41.14%   -8.38%     
==========================================
  Files          64       63       -1     
  Lines        2946     3028      +82     
  Branches      497      498       +1     
==========================================
- Hits         1459     1246     -213     
- Misses       1365     1717     +352     
+ Partials      122       65      -57     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
autogpt/agent/agent.py	13.86% <16.66%> (-31.27%)	:arrow_down:

... and 26 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[BillSchumacher]

LGTM - Didn't test though

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 16.66% and project coverage change: -8.86 :warning:

Comparison is base (eb0e967) 49.93% compared to head (25b4a15) 41.07%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3013      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   49.93%   41.07%   -8.86%     
==========================================
  Files          64       64              
  Lines        2900     2924      +24     
  Branches      488      492       +4     
==========================================
- Hits         1448     1201     -247     
- Misses       1333     1667     +334     
+ Partials      119       56      -63     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
autogpt/agent/agent.py	21.16% <16.66%> (-23.97%)	:arrow_down:

... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[richbeales]

Tested locally, LGTM