Sukera

Ok, regardless of that, can this be supported? This is not helix specific after all, any editor could send that. Or, barring that, not crash so I can continue using...

Well I did end up asking on [matrix](https://matrix.to/#/!zMuVRxoqjyxyjSEBXc:matrix.org/$vN1tm8D4g5r6tUD8MoM6vMtnRG7WHBv6Fn3RQAGKsrs?via=matrix.org&via=mozilla.org&via=envs.net) and got this as a response why "just check" is difficult:  To be fair, yes helix should also not just send...

No, these two are subtly different, e.g. in the case of forward declarations like ``` """ foobar MyDoc """ function foobar end foobar(a::Int) = ... foobar(a::Float64) = ... ``` I'd...

Well, an interface package like `Tables.jl` can have the (sometimes) only docstring, which can be jumped to with `textDocument/definition`, while a package implementing that interface then has `textDocument/implementation`. Seems more...

That other PR got closed, in favor of this one which got merged: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/42768

Maybe I'm going a little off the deep end here, but is targeting bare-metal (i.e., there is no OS) anything short of infeasible? Particularly in combination with `baremodule`, so that...

I think this has the potential to be as insidious in creating bugs as unchecked `@inbounds` is, if not more so, since the result is likely "just" completely wrong and...

In the past there's also been discussion around using `.foo` as syntax for broadcasting of functions, e.g. to map a broadcasted function over a collection of collections like `map(.foo, [...

This docstring feels awfully long, especially when viewed in `help>` or as a function hint in an editor - maybe it's better to have this behavior recorded in the manual,...

Sure: Expand for session ```julia [sukera@tempman vulkanAdventures]$ julia -q (@v1.9) pkg> activate --temp Activating new project at `/tmp/jl_d003TL` (jl_d003TL) pkg> add StaticArrays Updating registry at `~/.julia/registries/General.toml` Resolving package versions... Updating...