nc-time-axis
nc-time-axis copied to clipboard
No longer subclass `DateConverter` in `NetCDFTimeConverter`
🚀 Pull Request
This is a proof of concept to show that we can no longer subclass mpl.dates.DateConverter in NetCDFTimeConverter without any ill effects. I think it is unlikely that anyone downstream is depending on this relatively low-level detail of nc-time-axis, so it feels reasonably safe to change without a deprecation cycle, but I would be open to opinions of folks who feel otherwise.
xref: https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/issues/24951, https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/25662
cc: @ksunden
Codecov Report
Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.
Comparison is base (
4320c72) 93.10% compared to head (5e7fd71) 93.10%.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #127 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 93.10% 93.10%
=======================================
Files 1 1
Lines 203 203
Branches 47 47
=======================================
Hits 189 189
Misses 7 7
Partials 7 7
| Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| nc_time_axis/__init__.py | 93.10% <100.00%> (ø) |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
@spencerkclark This is great, thanks for raising this.
Perhaps we should wait for the dust to settle on mpl and then see if this flies?
@bjlittle agreed! In the short term I was posting this to signal to @ksunden that the design matplotlib settles on in https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/25662 does not necessarily need to hinge too strongly on this detail of nc-time-axis.
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.