468 Abm parameter study

[reneSchm]

Changes and Information

Please briefly list the changes (main added features, changed items, or corrected bugs) made:

• Simplify ParameterStudy, so it can use any parameter type and more generic simulations.
  • This strongly changes the class layout and usage.
• Add example for an ABM study.
• Usage and behavior in python bindings is mostly unchanged.

If need be, add additional information and what the reviewer should look out for in particular:

Merge Request - Guideline Checklist

Please check our git workflow. Use the draft feature if the Pull Request is not yet ready to review.

Checks by code author

• [x] Every addressed issue is linked (use the "Closes #ISSUE" keyword below)
• [x] New code adheres to coding guidelines
• [x] No large data files have been added (files should in sum not exceed 100 KB, avoid PDFs, Word docs, etc.)
• [x] Tests are added for new functionality and a local test run was successful (with and without OpenMP)
• [x] Appropriate documentation within the code (Doxygen) for new functionality has been added in the code
• [ ] Appropriate external documentation (ReadTheDocs) for new functionality has been added to the online documentation
• [x] Proper attention to licenses, especially no new third-party software with conflicting license has been added
• [ ] (For ABM development) Checked benchmark results and ran and posted a local test above from before and after development to ensure performance is monitored.

Checks by code reviewer(s)

• [ ] Corresponding issue(s) is/are linked and addressed
• [ ] Code is clean of development artifacts (no deactivated or commented code lines, no debugging printouts, etc.)
• [ ] Appropriate unit tests have been added, CI passes, code coverage and performance is acceptable (did not decrease)
• [ ] No large data files added in the whole history of commits(files should in sum not exceed 100 KB, avoid PDFs, Word docs, etc.)
• [ ] On merge, add 2-5 lines with the changes (main added features, changed items, or corrected bugs) to the merge-commit-message. This can be taken from the briefly-list-the-changes above (best case) or the separate commit messages (worst case).

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

:x: Patch coverage is 94.36620% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review. :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 97.25%. Comparing base (aa541c0) to head (0c1e723). :warning: Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
cpp/memilio/compartments/parameter_studies.h	92.72%	4 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main    #1395    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   97.25%   97.25%            
========================================
  Files         176      182     +6     
  Lines       15466    15662   +196     
========================================
+ Hits        15041    15232   +191     
- Misses        425      430     +5     

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:

• :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.