Results 14 comments of Sarthak Agarwal

Hey @zoonage, this feature sounds what I was trying with #1766, but your integration is much better

Apologies if I am being too eager but is there a way I could get a review on this, it's my first open source contribution so really excited for this...

Formatting issues fixed 😃

@googs1025, the tests went through 👌

Thank you for the kind words @ingvagabund ! I was thinking of the same thing, but I thought it would be easier if I contained it to just Utilization use-case,...

What if we add optional profile-level nodeSelector while keeping existing plugin-level support: ``` type DeschedulerProfile struct { Name string `json:"name"` PluginConfigs []PluginConfig `json:"pluginConfig"` Plugins Plugins `json:"plugins"` NodeSelector map[string]string `json:"nodeSelector,omitempty"` //...