try codium

[huskydoge]

trafficstars

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

[huskydoge]

try

[huskydoge]

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

[CodiumAI-Agent]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: This PR mainly focuses on updating the website's CSS and HTML files to improve the visual appearance and functionality. It also updates the author's personal information in the _config.yml file.
• 📝 PR summary: The PR includes changes to the CSS files to add new classes and animations, updates to HTML files to include new scripts and links, and modifications to the _config.yml file to update the author's personal information. It also modifies the navigation.yml file to update the website's navigation structure.
• 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3, because the PR includes a significant amount of changes to the CSS and HTML files which require a careful review to ensure they do not break the website's layout and functionality.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and the changes are logically grouped. However, it would be beneficial to include a more detailed description of the changes in the PR description, explaining the purpose of each change and its impact on the website's appearance or functionality.

🤖 Code feedback:

---

relevant file	assets/css/main.scss
suggestion	It would be beneficial to separate the CSS classes into different files based on their functionality for better organization and easier maintenance. [medium]
relevant line	.tooltip {

---

relevant file	_includes/head.html
suggestion	It would be better to load the CSS files from a local source instead of a CDN to reduce the website's dependency on external sources. [medium]
relevant line

---

relevant file	_config.yml
suggestion	It is recommended to avoid hardcoding personal information in the _config.yml file. Instead, consider using environment variables or a separate configuration file that is not tracked in the version control system. [important]
relevant line	email : "[email protected]"

---

relevant file	_sass/_animations.scss
suggestion	The naming of the animation 'blink' is too generic. Consider using a more descriptive name that indicates its purpose or effect. [medium]
relevant line	@keyframes blink {

---

---

✨ Usage guide:

---

Overview: The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR. When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the code feedback section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is: pr_commands = ["/review", ...] meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

About the 'Code feedback' section The review tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions. If you are interested only in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the improve feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results. Use the review tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well.

Auto-labels The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag) a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)

Extra sub-tools The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_review, enable_review_labels_effort, and more.

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

[CodiumAI-Agent]

PR Review

PR feedback
⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	4, because the PR includes a wide range of changes across multiple files, including CSS, HTML, and configuration files. The changes involve both content updates and stylistic adjustments, which require careful review to ensure consistency and compatibility across different parts of the project.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
🔍 Possible issues	The tooltip CSS in both '_sass/_page.scss' and 'assets/css/main.scss' might cause redundancy and inconsistency. Consider consolidating these styles. The use of transform: scaleX(0); and transform: scaleX(1); for the tooltip underline animation could be improved for browser compatibility. The addition of multiple font-awesome related files and links might lead to loading performance issues. Consider using a single, minified version. The removal of some navigation items in '_data/navigation.yml' without explanation could impact site navigation and user experience.
🔒 Security concerns	No

Code feedback:

---

relevant file	_sass/_page.scss
suggestion	Consider merging the tooltip styles defined in '_sass/_page.scss' and 'assets/css/main.scss' to avoid redundancy and ensure consistency. [important]
relevant line	.tooltip {

---

relevant file	_sass/_page.scss
suggestion	Use a more compatible approach for the tooltip underline animation instead of transform: scaleX(0); and transform: scaleX(1);. Consider using visibility or opacity for better cross-browser support. [medium]
relevant line	transform: scaleX(0); /* 初始时隐藏下划线 */

---

relevant file	_includes/head.html
suggestion	Consolidate the font-awesome CSS links to use a single, minified version to improve loading performance. [important]
relevant line

---

relevant file	_data/navigation.yml
suggestion	Ensure the removal of navigation items like "News", "Projects", and "Experience" is intentional and consider the impact on site navigation and user experience. [medium]
relevant line	# - title: "News"

---

---

✨ Usage guide:

---

Overview: The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR. When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is: pr_commands = ["/review", ...] meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

Auto-labels The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag) a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)

Extra sub-tools The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

Auto-approve PRs By invoking: /review auto_approve The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: [pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: [pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.