RMKirkpatrick

I agree with Hunter that catching a latent in its own indicator list violates WYSIWID too much for core OpenMx. It'd be better if umx caught such a case instead.

Relevant forums thread: https://openmx.ssri.psu.edu/node/4401

If Solaris support is something we really want, I'd prefer we made a priority of first supporting an active fork of OpenSolaris, e.g. [Illumos](https://wiki.illumos.org/display/illumos/illumos+Home). If we can get it working...

> `mxCompare` reports AIC as NA for a comparison of 2 cov models... (despite AIC() working on each model) That may be by design. I know that @mhunter1 deliberately chose...

> PS: the cran version is showing 2.17.4, but the travis version (newer) is reporting 2.17.3.171 I guess travis is building from a clone of the repository that lacks the...

Something relevant I just noticed... Look at the conditional starting at what is currently line 1019 of R/MxSummary.R . The behavior of `AIC.MxModel` depends partly upon whether `model@output$Minus2LogLikelihood` is `NULL`....

@tbates It is at least tangentially relevant, but I think #279 reflects a bug in the backend. I will look into both this issue and #279 today.

I may have this one figured out. Fingers crossed...

See 34548e5 . @tbates , does this look better?: ``` > mxCompare(w1, w2) base comparison ep minus2LL df AIC diffLL diffdf p 1 DWLS 6 NA 275 -527.6498 NA NA...

34548e5 passes 'make test' on my local machine. However, it failed to build on travis.