Make the official OWL RL tests part of the project

[wrobell]

The readme file states this version passes the full batch of official OWL Full/RL tests. It would be good to make the tests part of the project to make collaboration easier and more constructive.

[blokhin]

Artur, I believe that's this: ~~https://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Full (namely, https://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Test_Suite_Status). However the overall state is quite sad (404 pages, not maintained etc.)~~

UPDATE found it:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0155

The link to the original cade2011-schneidsut-owlfullatp.zip with the tests, mentioned in the article, is now dead, but luckily I downloaded it several years ago to my archives: https://yadi.sk/d/rwQwxMuYrJMMaQ

[wrobell]

It seems like cade2011-schneidsut-owlfullatp/testdata/coverage/testsuite-owl2-rdfbased.zip contained in the above file is our starting point?

I do not see any license associated with the file, so I wonder if we can include it as part of the project?

[wrobell]

Also http://owl.semanticweb.org/exports/approved/index.html

[nicholascar]

I agree (as I said in your PR now approved) that we really do need the official test to actually know how the tool is performing in a comprehensive manner. I hope we can all start to outline the full set of tests first and then start chipping away at implementing them all soon. I may have more time to contribute over summer (Dec - Feb, here in Australia!),

[blokhin]

A series of the OWL Reasoner Evaluation workshops should be probably also mentioned here, namely:

• OWL Reasoner Evaluation 2014 (all results)
• OWL Reasoner Evaluation 2015 (report and code)
• OWL Reasoner Evaluation 2016 (report)
• 2017 ... 2019 (?)