Add cut bell pair benchmarking for dynamic circuits

[miamico]

Notebook adding a demonstration of the new dynamic circuit capabilities. In particular, dynamic circuit performance is benchmarked device-wide by preparing 4-qubit chains where Bell pairs on the middle qubits are consumed through mid-circuit measurement and feedforward to create a Bell pair on the edge qubits.

[review-notebook-app[bot]]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[qiskit-bot]

Thanks for contributing to Qiskit documentation!

Before your PR can be merged, it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient. Thanks! 🙌

One or more of the following people are relevant to this code:

• @miamico

[miamico]

If all looks good, this is ready to be merged

[jyu00]

If all looks good, this is ready to be merged

Let's wait for Maika to do a final review

[nathanearnestnoble]

Plan: will merge this notebook with long range entanglement. Henry is working on this

[abbycross]

Now that the new DC have launched - good to merge, or is there more pending?

[miamico]

Let's get the final green light from @jyu00 and maika to ensure we're not missing something that has come up since July

[jyu00]

@miamico last time I talked with Maika and @nathanearnestnoble , the plan was to fold the bell pair benchmarking into @henryzou50's LRCX tutorial?

[miamico]

@jyu00 I'd be weary of doing that as it would make the notebook quite a bit longer and confuse its scope. I wasn't aware that the decision had been made and there have been no comment on it during the review of LRCX tutorial so I think the best course of action is to keep them separate.

[nathanearnestnoble]

@miamico lets discuss what may work well -- this was a plan we had put together in discussion while you were out, and I think has the benefit of showing off parallel execution of EDC.

[miamico]

I've edited the options (which are not experimental anymore). @beckykd If everything looks good we can merge this tutorial

[abbycross]

@miamico in step 3, can we then remove this sentence?: "The following experimental options are only required during the early-access period"

[miamico]

@miamico in step 3, can we then remove this sentence?: "The following experimental options are only required during the early-access period"

Oh missed that! Let me remove it

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
3 out of 4 committers have signed the CLA.

:white_check_mark: miamico
:white_check_mark: 0sophy1
:white_check_mark: abbycross
:x: Mirko Amico

---

Mirko Amico seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[abbycross]

Uh oh, the dreaded CLA-signing message... @miamico you might need to configure your GH account to accept another email address maybe? Here are the instructions

[miamico]

I don't understand why there's another "Mirko Amico" along with my GitHub account (miamico). I looked at the instructions and added the email associated with my GitHub account to git config but unsure what to do next