Patrick Collins

Running `vyper` and the contract name compiles fine

Got it. Went through the code and found it grabs it from the comments: ```python # @version ^0.3.3 ``` It looks like we should create docs for each plugin

+1 Additionally, if you use `HuffConfig`, foundry will stop being able to recognize tests. ie: If I run: ``` forge test -m testSolveHuff ``` And my test looks like: ```javascript...

Why not use modifiers instead of comments? I really dislike the idea of using comments as a sort of function decorator. What are the thoughts on: `foundry.toml` ```toml [profile.ci.fuzz] runs...

Hmm... I see your points. They make sense. But maybe there is some advantage to having the compiler take it on. For example, if you format your custom runs incorrectly,...

Thanks for the response. Re: "In any case, comments already affect the bytecode of smart contracts (because of metadata), so the logic of comments in Solidity has to be taught...

Going to close, looks like we didn't fix some of the indentation issues. But all good!

Yes, the `result` is the one the node will use, not the `data.result`.

aah... crap. I will have to update...

aahhh... what do you think, maybe we just tell people to skip to the graph?? aahhh