PascalSenn

@michaelstaib i think it would make sense to way with this one until we have internal fields. Everything else would be a hack

@michaelstaib i guess for this `@internal` fields would be nice

I guess something like this should work ```csharp public class QueryableStringInvariantEqualsHandler : QueryableStringOperationHandler { public QueryableStringInvariantEqualsHandler(InputParser inputParser) : base(inputParser){ } private static readonly MethodInfo _toLower = typeof(string).GetMethods().Single( x => x.Name...

@Sangeetha-Murugesan can you push a reproduction into a simple example project?

@Sangeetha-Murugesan I do not know what should not work in your example project

can you provide an example query or something similar?

@AradAral have you tried it with more than one field on the author?

@AradAral hmm.. interesting. how does your resolver look like? what is the order of the middleware's? Btw, we do project it directly to the field. We project it like this:...

@JustinGrote I have a proof of concept of an adapter already, I will open a draft PR this week.

@JoeRobich should we remove the old code lense and wire up the testingProvider with it?