OvermindDL1

For note, everything should be piecemeal in different commits if you wish to review it more easily. And for note, I made this because I really hate elixir's normal `with`...

I am thinking of adding an option to return a tagged_tuple as well, if so should it be an option or another name for it (`block?` maybe? I'm not sure...

Although I guess the user could just pipe it into the tagged tuple maker though...

What is your thought on adding another expression type of `a

Hmm, yeah I'm leaning to having `

> I'm generally a fan. Did you have any specific concerns, @OvermindDL1 ? Mostly just what I mentioned above, which is pure usage issues, the code seems sound from my...

I wouldn't be remotely surprised if there were corner cases not caught so a good test suite would be very nice!

> EDIT: actually, it would be more like this (👇) in a pipe, I guess. (cases are also a lot more flexible than ifs, which is a nice side-benefit of...

> Nice! I'm glad to see a few of these popping up. We all need more ML-family languages in our lives! _/me loves ML languages, especially OCaml_ Typing Elixir itself...

Yep, definitely still interested in if_exception handling bodies instead of functions. :-) I'd really like something like this: ```elixir blah |> if_exception val do nil else val + 1 end...