Jan

Is this correct? To me the described syntax rather means "show name in any referencing attribute, like dropdown or list view link", the join will still always be executed based...

Still not convinced. We are using the syntax and it works as **I did** describe. See also the syntax description here: https://www.jhipster.tech/jdl/relationships#syntax ---> `` Also the .pro site looks kind...

We have implemented such a thing as you proposed by ourselves for our own application using Blueprint mechanisms so that users can easily define filters based on the available operations...

> I don't understand the insistence on filtering only on foreign keys and not the actual data in the table. I didn't say we _only_ want to filter for foreign...

Seems like the "IT" tests are not failing, even though they may should in the current state. I have debugged a sample application using this change and seems like when...

By the way, for some reasons, it complains about some Sonar findings - but the only thing I changed there was to extend one test entity. I do wonder, if...

Ok, and any hints regarding testability of these added attributes, if anything that happens in our own generated code won't notice any change due to Spring Data JPA's behaviour?

I guess, I may finish this in around 4 weeks - heading off to some vacation. :-) I think, the very first commit here would already be "worth" integrating, as...

No, won't manage that. Actually I even forgot about this here, but I'd take it up in the next few days then.

> @OmarHawk readonly is quite uncommon use case. This looks related to #25414 Use saveAndFlush for jpa and entity with fields that requires flush like `@AutoGenerated`? > > Not sure...