osmcha-frontend
osmcha-frontend copied to clipboard
Tagging "good" changesets
I'm submitting a feature request
Brief Description
I sometimes see changesets with good review, but tagged with eg tag "Unintentional" or "Severity:Low". This looks odd and not logical. Can also be interpreted by the changeset creator as criticism, wich it is maybe not.
What is the motivation / use case for this feature?
Make the tagging system more logical and understandable.
Other Information / context:
You can verify a changeset good or bad. Doing that opens the possibility to tag it. You can tag both when reviewing good or bad.
At the same time the Guide says "it's recommended and essentially used to describe the details of the changeset that was found to be bad."
And that is logical with the tags now available. They all have a negative connotation.
So wouldn't it be better:
- to not show the tags when a changeset is reviewed as good?
- Or think of more appropriate tags when a changeset is good?