as-bignum
as-bignum copied to clipboard
u256 on top of u128
Why not to build u256 on top of u128? Implementation will be the same as u128 on top of u64. Implementation can even be templated by subtype.
I wasn't done for performance reasons. as-bignum exclusively focused on perf. Building over u128 will cause to significant overhead
@MaxGraey agree, but I would prefer to have working implementation first and optimized shipped with update.