Paul Macklin
Paul Macklin
Hmm, let's consider this one a bit more deeply after 1.13.1, just in case. I'm getting "branch conflicts" right now as well ... Thanks!
Hmm, so if I'm reading this correct, this adds a `` sub-field to an existing `cell_population` field? This should work, although we may want to find a way to add...
Thanks. IN the future, maybe we will extend / stnadardize with something like: `` `` etc. Then we could have more in-depth discussion on how to standardize. But for now,...
checks look good. let's approve this PR. thank you!