MasterDuke17

I see I'll need to implement a max length parameter to pass on to the new `mp_to_radix`. Or is the suggestion in https://github.com/libtom/libtommath/pull/330#issuecomment-527201525 what I should do instead of turning...

> At first I thought it was [Bouvier et al.](https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00864293v1/document) but it is really "just" D&C (Schoenhage, Knuth, Bernstein, and probably many more but I think Arnold Schoenhage was first)...

> > how about leaving mp_todecimal as a macro and calling s_mp_todecimal_fast() from mp_to_radix() if the radix == 10? > > Not possible since MP_HAS is only available privately and...

> Would it be possible to get the generalized version for arbitrary bases replacing the current impl? Once I get the current version renamed and accepting (and using) a maxlen...

How do people feel about me creating a new PR (or aggressively cleaning up history for this one) once I have the maxlen support implemented? I think at that point...

Cool, glad to see work on libtommath is still going on. Let me caveat this upfront by saying I'm not a number theorist, not even any kind of mathematician, and...

https://github.com/Raku/old-issue-tracker/issues/6053 for some reference as to why those tests were added

NQP tests fixed in https://github.com/perl6/nqp/commit/c7f4dfe9e1

But why are those not coercive? There's no reason given.

> It could have been the case that many others reported that they aren't troubled by the length of `.assuming` FWIW, that's pretty much the camp I fall into (however,...