Thorsten Lünborg
Thorsten Lünborg
that doesn't create any problems.
I didn't actually close this, the author did and j missed that.
@preeteshjain Your approach is not mutating an object or array prop, and you approach is still mutating a prop, so that's *not* what the docs recommend.
Okay, so here's the deal: * We don't really have the capacity to track this repo reliably anymore - obviously. * We realize we need some suport from y'all to...
@ajtruex As explained, start reviewing PRs and work with @Scrum to get them merged. @Scrum you can ping me when you think I can add him so you have a...
The difference between your initial example and the options API one with3.2.27 is not in the watcher behavior. It's in the way you use `provide`. (However, yes there is a...
I'm not really convinced this would be a good idea as well. > @sxzz I don't use TypeScript, I hate it. You can't just assume everyone's using TypeScript. instead of...
I get your perspective. And I would be cool with supporting this if we could make it work in a way that would not degrade DX like props inference in...
Because we need to transform it into a normal emits declaration during compilation: ```html const emits = defineEmits(['someEvent']) // setup code ... ``` essentially is compiled to this *during build*:...
We are working on something else, a curated list with a dedicated website where we provide a curated selection of components from the community that are high-quality, actively maintained (or...