Erik van Blokland

These are based on the bounds. Is there also a need for the same values, but based on the width, descender and ascender?

as long as they're all read-only, right?

Is this solving a problem, rather than just convenience?

We could consider to add group support to the syntax. I know this would screw things up.

Nothing complicated. The names listed in the rule could be @groupname and then hope that the group is defined in the font.groups

What do you mean with normalising the factor?

Not sure I understand why that would be useful? * the factor is generally `0 < f < 1`, so floats are kind of necessary. * extrapolations are possible, the...

This will be fixed in the upcoming PR.

The proposal is to rename the `ar*` glyphs to `per*`, and then use the `ar` names for the missing values. Is that correct, @typoman? @typemytype ``` ٠ arzero U+0660 (was:...

Ok. What are the arguments for "Persian" over "Farsi"? I do need to think about the repercussions of the re-assigning of the name `arzero` from U+06F0 to U+0660