Kristoffer Strube

It is a potential memory leak that the events that get created when an `EventListener` handles an event are not exposed. We should ensure that the events created to invoke...

Currently, this is the signature of `AddOnAbortEventListener`: ```csharp public async Task AddOnAbortEventListener( Func callback, AddEventListenerOptions? options = null ) ``` But we want to standardize our event methods to only...

We currently use a helper method to invoke the `addEventListener` method in places like this: ```csharp public async Task AddEventListenerAsync(string type, EventListener? callback, AddEventListenerOptions? options = null) where TEvent :...

To make it easier to implement events that are in-process we should define an interface for the members that are exposed as a part of an `EventInProcess` called `IEventInProcess`. This...

Missing implementation of new methods for `IJSRuntime` and `IJSObjectReference` introduced in .NET 10.

4

In ASP.NET Core 10 Preview 4, we have new methods available for `IJSRuntime` and `IJSObjectReference` for getting and setting attributes, and calling JS constructors. So [BunitJSRuntime](https://github.com/bUnit-dev/bUnit/blob/main/src/bunit.web/JSInterop/Implementation/BunitJSRuntime.cs) and [BunitJSObjectReference](https://github.com/bUnit-dev/bUnit/blob/main/src/bunit.web/JSInterop/Implementation/BunitJSObjectReference.cs) need to...

In #13, we are deleting some types and some methods, which is a breaking change. While we are making breaking changes, we should look at whether we want to remove/change...