cl_mobileye_reservation_sets

[aharon-abramson]

Add cl_mobileye_reservation_sets extension and related API definitions

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
4 out of 10 committers have signed the CLA.

:white_check_mark: bashbaug
:white_check_mark: aharon-abramson
:white_check_mark: SunSerega
:white_check_mark: frasercrmck
:x: tomasz-platek
:x: gowtham-sarc
:x: cycheng
:x: ssugumar-mstk
:x: gwawiork
:x: pjaaskel
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[bashbaug]

You may want to rebase so this PR only includes your changes. It looks like it picked up a bunch of other commits, which is confusing the CLA bot. There is a merge conflict that needs to be resolved now, also. Thanks!

[pjaaskel]

Thanks for working on this. Did you consider improving/extending the current pipe spec instead? We wrote down some thoughts about it in this IWOCL publication.

[pjaaskel]

Could we represent the concept of "reservation sets" using command buffers or command queues with a special property flag that says the kernels enqueued there should make concurrent progress or similar? I'm a big fan of trying to reduce API fragmentation.