formatter with Runic
Formatting cleanup using JuliaFormatter.format(".") to ensure consistent code style across the package. This reduces noisy diffs in future changes and improves readability. No functional changes.
Closes #1401
Modifications
- [x] add
.formatingwith scripts - [x] modified README.md. Added formatting rules
- [x] added
.git-blame-ignore-revsto - [x] applied formatting
Tests
- [x] are passing
I'd actually prefer Runic, it seems to work fine in StatsFuns and PDMats and I've been bitten by JuliaFormatter 2 problems a few times. GLM uses JuliaFormatter though, so there is no agreed on standard in JuliaStats yet.
I'd actually prefer Runic, it seems to work fine in StatsFuns and PDMats and I've been bitten by JuliaFormatter 2 problems a few times. GLM uses JuliaFormatter though, so there is no agreed on standard in JuliaStats yet.
completely fine with me, I do not have preference
Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 83.28518% with 405 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 86.21%. Comparing base (
abb151c) to head (3bede98).
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1987 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.28% 86.21% -0.08%
==========================================
Files 146 146
Lines 8787 8798 +11
==========================================
+ Hits 7582 7585 +3
- Misses 1205 1213 +8
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
The work is complete. Tests are passing. Could you please review?
ping @st-- , the author of original issue #1401, for an opinion.
Maybe let's merge https://github.com/JuliaStats/Distributions.jl/pull/1905 before changing the formatting.