LimitedLDLFactorizations.jl
LimitedLDLFactorizations.jl copied to clipboard
Change Real to Number
Codecov Report
Base: 88.91% // Head: 88.91% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:
Coverage data is based on head (
2d747e8) compared to base (51eec8d). Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #79 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.91% 88.91%
=======================================
Files 1 1
Lines 388 388
=======================================
Hits 345 345
Misses 43 43
| Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| src/LimitedLDLFactorizations.jl | 88.91% <100.00%> (ø) |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Could we just leave Tf as an (unspecified) parameter?
Probably, the only issue would be that if there is an error because of Tf, it would be more difficult to debug (for example I don't know if this would work directly for complex numbers).
If you think that it's fine, I can open a PR.
As you pointed out earlier, we need to use conj in appropriate places to ensure correctness, but I think I would leave Tf free.