Joe4evr

@gafter As a guess, that doc might be pointing to the wrong issue then. I think "Custom Fixed" might be referring to being able to support `fixed` statements for custom...

> You'd just only be able to implement an interface on a static class if the interface was also static, but making the interface static wouldn't require that all implementers...

@weitzhandler Your example is pretty flawed since lambdas can't be passed as an attribute parameter; only primitives, `string`, `typeof()` expressions, and `DateTime` literals (VB). A more sensible example of where...

> I thought part of this proposal was allowing complex params I attribute initialization I have not seen this proposal before, not to mention that such a thing would require...

> Will it be part of C# 8.X release? Can I start using it with some preview version? Sadly, [despite the Roslyn PR being ready for literally a year now](https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/26337),...

@TonyValenti Given that this issue is labeled as "10.0 Candidate", the answer is "No".

> tell the user (s)he has to rename `A.field` first. And what if `A` was in another assembly altogether? 🙃

> 2\. Add a new generic constraint that forces a generic parameter to be of a type having all static members implemented whenever you want to use static abstract members....

> type inference will not infer type arguments of an interface, so if I have a `TFooBar : IFooBar`, then it's sometimes necessary to type method arguments that are conceptually...

Can restrictions around `partial` just be relaxed entirely? I'd like it if `partial abstract class` worked just the same as `abstract partial class`.