mcp-context-forge icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
mcp-context-forge copied to clipboard

[Feature Request]: Approval based Promotion of MCP Server to MCP Registry

Open sunvk opened this issue 1 month ago • 0 comments

Currently MCP Servers in the MCP Registry can be added to local MCP Servers from the MCP Registry tab. Opposite is not supported, ie- An entry in MCP Servers tab cant be added to MCP Registry using the portal.

We would like to have a feature, where an approval based Promotion of MCP Server to MCP Registry is allowed. Team ADMIN or Plaform Admin can approve a request to promote MCP Server to MCP Registry and it should be added to MCP Registry.

🧭 Type of Feature

Please select the most appropriate category:

  • [ ] Enhancement to existing functionality
  • [*] New feature or capability
  • [ ] New MCP-compliant server
  • [ ] New component or integration
  • [ ] Developer tooling or test improvement
  • [ ] Packaging, automation and deployment (ex: pypi, docker, quay.io, kubernetes, terraform)
  • [ ] Other (please describe below)

🧭 Epic

Title: <High-level feature or capability> Goal: What is the big-picture objective of this feature set? Why now: Why is this needed? Who benefits?


🙋♂️ User Story 1

As a: I want: So that: <some reason / value>

✅ Acceptance Criteria

Scenario: First scenario title
  Given some starting state
  When an action occurs
  Then a result should happen

Scenario: Second scenario title
  Given another state
  When something else happens
  Then another result occurs

🙋♂️ User Story 2

As a: I want: So that:

✅ Acceptance Criteria

Scenario: Third scenario title
  Given a specific setup
  When a user performs an action
  Then something meaningful happens

📐 Design Sketch (optional)

Include a diagram, sketch, or flow (use Mermaid if desired):

flowchart TD
    A[Client] -->|POST /completions| B(MCPGateway)
    B --> C[Completion Service]

🔗 MCP Standards Check

  • [ ] Change adheres to current MCP specifications
  • [ ] No breaking changes to existing MCP-compliant integrations
  • [ ] If deviations exist, please describe them below:

🔄 Alternatives Considered

List any alternative designs, existing workarounds, or rejected ideas.


📓 Additional Context

Include related issues, links to discussions, issues, etc.

sunvk avatar Oct 16 '25 17:10 sunvk