[Feature Request]: Teams has to map to roles & permission

[sunvk]

Currently when we create a team, we can only set the visibility whether it is private or public. But what specific actions they can perform on specific features, objects, or data etc is missing. We would like to have Fine-Grained Roles & Permissions. What all a team can do on the differant aspects of the MCP Context forge application.

🧭 Type of Feature

Please select the most appropriate category:

• [ ] Enhancement to existing functionality
• [*] New feature or capability
• [ ] New MCP-compliant server
• [ ] New component or integration
• [ ] Developer tooling or test improvement
• [ ] Packaging, automation and deployment (ex: pypi, docker, quay.io, kubernetes, terraform)
• [ ] Other (please describe below)

🧭 Epic

Title: <High-level feature or capability> Goal: What is the big-picture objective of this feature set? Why now: Why is this needed? Who benefits?

---

🙋♂️ User Story 1

As a: I want: So that: <some reason / value>

✅ Acceptance Criteria

Scenario: First scenario title
  Given some starting state
  When an action occurs
  Then a result should happen

Scenario: Second scenario title
  Given another state
  When something else happens
  Then another result occurs

---

🙋♂️ User Story 2

As a: I want: So that:

✅ Acceptance Criteria

Scenario: Third scenario title
  Given a specific setup
  When a user performs an action
  Then something meaningful happens

---

📐 Design Sketch (optional)

Include a diagram, sketch, or flow (use Mermaid if desired):

flowchart TD
    A[Client] -->|POST /completions| B(MCPGateway)
    B --> C[Completion Service]

---

🔗 MCP Standards Check

• [ ] Change adheres to current MCP specifications
• [ ] No breaking changes to existing MCP-compliant integrations
• [ ] If deviations exist, please describe them below:

---

🔄 Alternatives Considered

List any alternative designs, existing workarounds, or rejected ideas.

---

📓 Additional Context

Include related issues, links to discussions, issues, etc.