Gregor

LGTM, though tests would be nice

Great! I don't have merge rights here, that would be @heikir

I'm leaning towards leaving this as a caveat and not trying to solve it, due to its complexity and us not having the use-case. That said, if you feel strongly...

There is an interesting split here, where your inline example does not seem to require recursive/lazy types, it could be schemad like this: ```ts const messageSchema = z.object({ message: z.string()...

Thanks (again^23)! As a side-comment, at some point I'd love to factor React out into a separate packages and publish zodex without it. In my mind that's the last blocker...

> Sure. For now, did you want this one? I've rebased. Thanks, that's indeed what I wanted. Looking at the PR now I'm wondering though if we could make the...

I've dropped React in #42

Oh good point, thanks! I'm still thinking I want to export that so that people can implement the dropped UI code on their side easily

While I like the simplicity of having browser ready JS, I don't like vendoring in zod. My leaning would be to just use vite, as we're already depending on it...

Uuh I must’ve missed the gh pages part sorry, will check again (looking at it from my phone atm, so it will be later). But in general I’d also use...