Inefficient handling of burn in phase in sampling functions

[TolisChal]

trafficstars

In header include/sampling.hpp the sampling functions do not handle the burn in phase efficiently. They store the points of burn in phase and then they delete them.

RandomPointGenerator::apply(P, p, c, a, eta, nburns, walk_len, randPoints, push_back_policy, rng); randPoints.clear();

We need a new function to perform the burn in phase efficiently.

[purna135]

I would like to work on this issue

[Rajat1206]

I'd like to work on this issue if it's still open!

[nanu1605]

@TolisChal Is this still open? I would love to work on it

[vissarion]

@nanu1605 please feel free to open a PR.

[hzratali]

@TolisChal Is this still open? I would love to work on it Hey, are you working with this issue, if not then please assign me this issue. I would love to work on it.

[vissarion]

@ha-rahman there are no assignments on issues, everyone is free to start working on a issue. The first pull request that is reviewed and approved will be merged.

[hzratali]

Thank you.

On Mon, 13 Mar 2023, 17:01 Vissarion Fisikopoulos, @.***> wrote:

@ha-rahman https://github.com/ha-rahman there are no assignments on issues, everyone is free to start working on a issue. The first pull request that is reviewed and approved will be merged.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/GeomScale/volesti/issues/180#issuecomment-1465976975, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVNJLFOFDEEWDL32YF66GQLW34AS5ANCNFSM5FEROUGQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[KhushV25]

hey , can i work on this?

[vissarion]

@KhushV25 sure, please go ahead and submit a PR.

[nick2432]

can i submit a PR?