Philip Howard

We've not got any framework for this yet, so I'm not quite sure how to communicate it. For now it will suffice just to document '2' as being required and...

Not yet, sorry, I've been a bit lax pushing out updates recently but I'm keeping my eye on things. A mental note has been duly made!

At this point someone needs to reach out to the manufacturer and ask for good quality top-down photos of the boards. Either that, or an existing owner could snap some,...

Because GPIO is wrong. 😆 That said, the GPIO numbers are the same as the physical ones, IIRC, which are also listed so we have those number to hand. I...

Now the design has changed around the pinout, we have a very clear area that could accomodate some tabs to implement @ADBeasley's suggestion. Eg:  While I loathe to overload...

Captures of a working prototype. In GPIO mode the physical pin annotation becomes BCM pin annotation, though I'm not sure how clear that is.  

@rtfmoz2 when you see "GPIO" do you understand that to refer to the BCM or the Physical numbering scheme? BCM being the weird Broadcom ones, and Physical being the sequential...

The trouble with a horizontal layout is fitting the text labels. For our API images, I'm looking at very minimal horizontal images that do not have the labels, like so:...

It's much clearer, in fact, I might go for something in-between. With a very light colour to indicate no-connection.

 ^ how's this