Mypal
Mypal copied to clipboard
Feodor2
Things are changing.
I heve been meanly removed from the mypal development.
No new versions of mypal will be from me. Someone else to take the relay race.
For details read there Feodor2/Mypal#3
Also please dont argue with them
We've already explained to you that you cannot transfer the repository in its current state to anyone else because you don't have rights to do so while not being license-compliant. So don't ask anyone to do so here.
Also, you weren't "meanly removed". It was your own actions that caused this Open Source licensing problem for you. Those actions had consequences.
Yes i know that, no any things until become license-compliant.
Bu why you forbid me to ask.
I'm telling anyone reading this so there's no doubt about the current state of it and so people are informed who might skim over those details and in turn become in violation themselves. Nobody wants that.
Hello Feodor2,
if you do not continue mypal, do you have another browser, which you continue developing for Windows XP?
I woud like, though i cant say for sure. I need to take a rest this all was frustrating.
But sure i can help other people with continue i hope license does not restrict consulting.
Hello Feodor2, is there any other browser that you can customize and compile for Windows XP?
Жирной точкой был бы релиз 29.4.0.2 с langpack. Все-равно, я так понимаю, он уже готов. P.S. В любом случае спасибо за Mypal, успехов и счастья в личной жизни. Адью.
Hi Feodor2, I just like to say thanks for your really good work, providing mypal for people who don´t like to be managed and suppressed by their own operating systems. Hopefully there will be an alternative some time. kind regards, S.
Feodor, I would also like to iterate what sebigbos61 has said above. You have produced a remarkable high quality product for the past umpteen years that gave us XP fans a few more years worth of internet use.
Of course, I don't know any of the background story with the licensing issues; heck, I thought open licensing was open licensing. Kinda funny how politics (and money?) can come into play with open source. But, if there are powers that are controlling you, take a bow to those that use MyPal, give whomever it is the middle finger, and quit knowing that you've done a lot of good in the world.
We've already explained to you that you cannot transfer the repository in its current state to anyone else because you don't have rights to do so while not being license-compliant. So don't ask anyone to do so here.
Also, you weren't "meanly removed". It was your own actions that caused this Open Source licensing problem for you. Those actions had consequences.
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
We've already explained to you that you cannot transfer the repository in its current state to anyone else because you don't have rights to do so while not being license-compliant. So don't ask anyone to do so here.
Also, you weren't "meanly removed". It was your own actions that caused this Open Source licensing problem for you. Those actions had consequences.
Boo-hoo! Your claims are w/o merit and the offenses that you allege exist only in your imagination. You misinterpret and misrepresent MPL 2.0 and abuse the one who is 100% compliant. None of your rights have been violated because no fees are charged for distribution of the derivative software; therefore, you have no claim to make and no leg to stand on, in court. In truth, you are not allowed to withdraw the license once given, whereas your action at hand is exactly that. So you are in violation of MPL 2.0 whereas Feodor2 is not. Now, crawl under the rock that you had come from under and quit polluting the world with your presence. Begone!
I'm telling anyone reading this so there's no doubt about the current state of it and so people are informed who might skim over those details and in turn become in violation themselves. Nobody wants that.
You (incorrectly) pretend or make yourself sound like an authority which you are not. The abusive language such as "I Am telling anyone" asserts authority whereas you are not one. Since your claims had not been proven in court, you may not make such assertions since you have no authority. You may, however, use language such as "I suggest" or "I recommend". That would be reasonable. Otherwise, where do you draw the line between yourself asserting (falsely) authority over Feodor2 and his users and them, in turn, turning the tables on you and asserting their authority over yourself?
And now, humanely, let it rest. You achieve no purpose in this world, by trying to shut Feodor2 down.
тут я не понел (ниасилил много букоф (300 коментов)) ****е коперасты, М$ и прочие ЕРЖ снова сделали свое дело? XPю снова вапасносте?
А это разрабы оригинального Pale Moon поносят Фёдора. Сначала ему отрубили магазин приложений, а затем уже и принялись форк убивать.
Сам не пойму, как репозиторий могут уничтожить к херам собачим, если ты нарушишь лицензию MPL... Там прям за этим следят, или что? Совершенно идиотская позиция
В любом случае у меня больше нет желания пользоваться или поддерживать Palemoon с такой отвратительной политикой. Все себе захапать хотят, суки
I knew GH is not good place.
It's not the GH problem, the Moonchild's is. They don't want to be in opensource community, so they decided to kill forks
I am amazed by the fact that Windows XP users were hurted by those who positioned all time themselves as supporters of opensource, traditions and stability.
@Feodor2 What is cause of problem? I see you get info only from Moonchild group, but they are not Moz. MLP 2.0: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/
Я вообще причины проблемы не вижу. Какой-то сюр. То ли @Feodor2 не понимает, что они шпрехают на инглише, то ли Мунчайлды абузят.
@wolfbeast Hello. I'm a third-party person who rights were touched, but has not notified.What is cause of problem?
@Feodor2 https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.ru.html
Важно понимать, что требование распространять файлы на условиях MPL относится только к стороне, которая впервые создает и распространяет “более крупное произведение”.
Распространять - это пункты 3.1, 3.2. Можешь вертать MyPal. P.S. 300 сообщений ни о чем. Я фигею.
P.S. 300 сообщений ни о чем. Я фигею.
Да один из писькогрызов пейл муна вообще был забанен на форуме MSFN, так что не удивительно
What exactly is going on? Can someone summarize? I just came today looking for an update. Before this moment, I thought of mypal as palemoon fork for xp that was created cuz the lead palemoon dev doesnt wanna build for XP himself. And I also imagined that it is the most popular browser for XP today and what everyone who still uses xp for internet uses. That's all I really knew before this.
I know there are 32-bit builds of palemoon for various linux distros done by third party people that are even linked from palemoon website (for example steve pusser does ubuntu and debian 32-bit builds) so I really don't get what the deal could possibly be preventing someone from building palemoon for xp... is it related to calling it mypal instead of just palemoon?
Or I'm getting hint its some licensing thing, and I am well aware open source doesnt mean free-for-all, there are zillions of open source licenses that aren't free for all, but doesnt mean cant follow license. Did mypal violate some license? If so what, and is there no way to build without violating that license? I know at a minimum the source code should be available, and it seems its not right now, so that needs to be fixed asap...
well, they are already good license like GPL or creative common. anyone can do anything with the code, public, private sell it, distribute it, as long as original authors name are not suppressed in the code.
